Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01494
Original file (BC 2013 01494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:	BC-2013-01494

		COUNSEL:	NONE 
		
		HEARING DESIRED:	NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “K13” (Completed 
Extended Enlistment) be changed so he may reenter in the Air 
Force.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His SPD Code for his discharge has been changed and is no longer 
applicable to his separation.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

_________________ ______________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted 
in the Regular Air Force on 26 Apr 71.

On 10 Nov 82, the applicant received an Article 15 for operating 
a vehicle while drunk, in violation of Article 111 of the 
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).  As a result, his 
punishment consisted of forfeiture of $365.00 of his base pay 
and 15 days restriction to base.

On 14 Dec 82, the applicant’s commander denied him the award of 
the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) based on a review of 
his personnel record and/or unfavorable information file.

On 1 Apr 86, the applicant was issued a referral Airman 
Performance Report (APR) for the period of 30 Mar 85 to 29 Mar 
86 based on unsatisfactory progress in the area of Non-
commissioned Officer (NCO) responsibilities.

On 20 Jan 87, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge 
with a narrative reason for separation of “Completed Extended 
Enlistment,” a reenlistment code (RE) of “2X” (first-term, 
second term, or career airman considered but not selected for 
reenlistment) and issued an SPD code of “K13” (Completed 
Extended Enlistment).  He was credited with 15 years, 8 months, 
and 24 days of total active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice.  There was no error in the preparation of 
the applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge 
from Active Duty, and the discharge was consistent with the 
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge 
authority.  The applicant’s military personnel records indicate 
he was not selected for reenlistment by his commander which 
established a RE code of 2X.  In accordance with AFI 36-3208, 
Administrative Separation of Airmen, Table 1.4, the applicant 
was appropriately discharged from the Air Force as reflected on 
his DD Form 214.  While a review of the applicant’s record did 
not reveal an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) 
Consideration, non-selecting him, his records did reflect that 
he was ineligible for promotion based on being denied 
reenlistment.  At the time of the applicant’s separation in 
January 1987, the SPD code “K13” was the correct SPD code used 
for members separating for “Completed Extended Enlistment.”  The 
applicant’s SPD code should not be changed.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant indicates that he was never informed that he was 
not promotable and the reason he was not promoted was because he 
received a poor performance report that led to his reenlistment 
being denied.  The low rating on his performance report came as 
a total surprise to him because his rater had not shown any 
dissatisfaction of his performance whether verbally or in 
writing.  He has recently begun a regimen of antidepressant 
medications for issues that he should have requested help for 
years ago.  If he had gotten the necessary help sooner, he would 
have been promoted and been allowed to remain in the Air Force.

A complete copy of the applicant’s response is at Exhibit E.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission, including his 
rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim 
of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence 
to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-01494 in Executive Session on 19 Dec 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                         , Panel Chair
	                         , Member
	                         , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Mar 13, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 28 May 13.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jun 13.
     Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 15 Jul 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair



3





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00931

    Original file (BC 2014 00931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00931 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01281

    Original file (BC 2014 01281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code “LGH” (Non- retention on active duty) is inaccurate and unjust. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02754

    Original file (BC-2005-02754.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following AF Forms 418, Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration, were on file in the master personnel record. She received an RE code of 2Y “A second-term or career airman considered but not selected for NCO status, or had vacated NCO status under AFR 39-13.” The complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 Oct 05, copies of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463

    Original file (BC 2013 03463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00360

    Original file (BC 2014 00360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Personnel Services Delivery Memorandum (PSDM) 13-14, FY13 Enlisted Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, dated 13 Feb 13 states that members with less than 6 years of active service separated under the DOS Rollback program will be separated with SPD code “JBK.” Her AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, Item 23, Remarks, reads SPD code “JBK.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. If any recoupment of unearned portions of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594

    Original file (BC 2014 00594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01746

    Original file (BC 2014 01746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 Feb 13, according to an AF Form 416, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, the applicant’s supervisor recommended he be denied reenlistment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03526

    Original file (BC 2014 03526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03526 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code “4I” which denotes “Serving on Control Roster” be changed to “3K” which denotes “Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or AFBCMR when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies” or “3B” which denotes “1st or 2nd term or career airman ineligible to reenlist.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657

    Original file (BC-2013-00657.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes “Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR,” to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03589

    Original file (BC 2014 03589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows: His separation code “JBK” which denotes “Completion of Required Active Service” be changed. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The medical records provided by the applicant are noted; however, he has not...